The Great Debate: Does the BR need to be fixed?

Here is my opinion on that.
Ok. Halo 2's BR was way too accurate and was a Hit-Scan weapon. Look at the updates on the front page. Here it is for those who are lazy.
In halo 2, the BR was WAY un-realistic. In real life, guns have recoil. This knocks anyones aim off quite a bit. First shot: right on target. Second shot: due to First Shot's recoil, off target. Third shot: Way off target due to recoil of the first and second shots. Go fire a gun. See how the recoil of your gun affects your aim. Then go to a shooting range and fire off a gun with a 3-round burst capability and see if all the bullets end up in one spot. Then go to a outdoors firing range equipped with moving targets. At a distance (about 100-200 yards) fire off the gun without leading the target. Then fire at it while leading the target.
I have found a vid on youtube explaining why a ton of Halo 2 people complain about the Halo 3's BR when they switched over. I'll post that vid here tomorrow as well as another vid if I can find it.
Watch This for further explanation of the BR.

ok, plain and simple, NO!!!! I love it how it is. It is very realistic, the burst is perfect. Halo 2, it was bad, plus you had to rapid fire except the SMG, which was worse. But, the BR and assault play off eachother perfectly. I love it, no it not be changed................the melee on the other hand..............

Exactly.